PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.82%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AMD's 3.78%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
177.57%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 5.53%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
251.26%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
251.26%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-44.77%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-60.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-60.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
19.85%
Slight or no buybacks while AMD is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
19.85%
Slight or no buyback while AMD is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
58.73%
Dividend growth of 58.73% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.52%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 47.60%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
39.52%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 47.60%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
28.30%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 44.71%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
179.25%
Similar net income/share CAGR to AMD's 182.94%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
179.25%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to AMD's 182.94%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
24.43%
Below 50% of AMD's 151.24%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
57.92%
Equity/share CAGR of 57.92% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
57.92%
Equity/share CAGR of 57.92% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
32.66%
Equity/share CAGR of 32.66% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
-14.28%
Cut dividends over 10 years while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-14.28%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-14.28%
Negative near-term dividend growth while AMD invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
4.15%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-9.16%
Inventory is declining while AMD stands at 2.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.64%
Asset growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.84%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-15.87%
We have a declining book value while AMD shows 7.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
2.31%
Debt growth far above AMD's 1.02%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.37%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AMD's 12.33%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.