PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.65%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
12.33%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
1050.00%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1050.00%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-15.38%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.01%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 13.33%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 13.33%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-0.01%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
69.74%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
20.39%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
18.60%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to AMD's 16.97%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
18.60%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to AMD's 16.97%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
10.01%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.11%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is at 85.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-17.11%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is 85.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-78.81%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.59%
Dividend/share CAGR of 76.59% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
76.59%
Dividend/share CAGR of 76.59% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
63.51%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 63.51% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.33%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
3.96%
We show growth while AMD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.15%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-0.58%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
4.84%
Debt growth far above AMD's 3.32%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.10%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.