PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.21%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
21.35%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
103.17%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
103.17%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
80.00%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
66.67%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
66.67%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
30.34%
Slight or no buybacks while AMD is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
30.34%
Slight or no buyback while AMD is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-26.23%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 3.70%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
1562.50%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
163.89%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
44.03%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to AMD's 47.50%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
33.59%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
17.30%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 15.50%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
461.80%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 195.84% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
43.62%
Below 50% of AMD's 355.42%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-30.51%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD is 210.20%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
90.48%
Dividend/share CAGR of 90.48% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
76.37%
Dividend/share CAGR of 76.37% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
76.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 76.37% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
25.69%
AR growth well above AMD's 2.51%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-2.17%
Inventory is declining while AMD stands at 1.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
7.24%
Asset growth above 1.5x AMD's 2.89%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-21.23%
We have a declining book value while AMD shows 8.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
19.09%
We have some new debt while AMD reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.56%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 0.57%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.