PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.18%
Negative revenue growth while AMD stands at 1.80%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-54.96%
Negative gross profit growth while AMD is at 3.50%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
23.89%
EBIT growth above 1.5x AMD's 13.54%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
23.89%
Operating income growth above 1.5x AMD's 13.54%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
5.19%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.97%
Share change of 1.97% while AMD is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
1.97%
Diluted share change of 1.97% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-10.10%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-70.45%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 25.82%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-120.49%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 2.50%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
36.26%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 64.95%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
10.62%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 20.40%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
9.60%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 22.29%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.27%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 426.61%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
616.08%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 438.02%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
-18.38%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is 155.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
456.75%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 282.59%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.07%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while AMD is at 29.88%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.94%
Dividend/share CAGR of 33.94% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-18.09%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
3.28%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AMD's 10.94%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
4.50%
We show growth while AMD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
7.75%
Similar asset growth to AMD's 8.59%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
1.80%
Under 50% of AMD's 7.15%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-2.91%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.30%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AMD's 1.16%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.