205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.66%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 2.27%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
11.13%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
26.01%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
26.01%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
30.36%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
25.00%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
25.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
8.46%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 1.11%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
8.46%
Diluted share count expanding well above AMD's 1.32%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-11.64%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
10.43%
OCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 3.61%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
36.00%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
54.72%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 92.96%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
23.99%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 20.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
19.32%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 36.40%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1572.62%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 161.08%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
250.38%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 336.69%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
41.03%
Below 50% of AMD's 601.48%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
2034.79%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 385.40%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.72%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while AMD is at 58.61%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.00%
Dividend/share CAGR of 45.00% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-7.24%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
13.12%
AR growth well above AMD's 14.49%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
13.04%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 14.30%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
5.91%
Asset growth at 75-90% of AMD's 7.39%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
-1.03%
We have a declining book value while AMD shows 5.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
0.44%
Debt shrinking faster vs. AMD's 27.31%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.27%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 0.22%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.