205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.49%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of AMD's 3.94%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
6.95%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 5.32%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
39.71%
EBIT growth above 1.5x AMD's 13.60%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
39.71%
Operating income growth above 1.5x AMD's 13.60%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
37.31%
Net income growth above 1.5x AMD's 10.22%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
33.33%
EPS growth above 1.5x AMD's 9.30%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
33.33%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x AMD's 9.76%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.82%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 1.21%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.55%
Diluted share count expanding well above AMD's 0.56%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-0.81%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-29.54%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 30.85%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-82.21%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 1.53%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
65.84%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 103.37%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
35.07%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 59.24%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
26.89%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 50.67%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1140.12%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 12243.08%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
1129.69%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 295.42% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
52.11%
Below 50% of AMD's 532.50%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
199.89%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of AMD's 351.90%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.43%
Below 50% of AMD's 98.81%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
10.94%
Dividend/share CAGR of 10.94% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
2.72%
Dividend/share CAGR of 2.72% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-88.41%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
7.11%
AR growth well above AMD's 0.25%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
4.86%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 7.45%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
3.78%
Asset growth at 50-75% of AMD's 5.64%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
6.90%
Similar to AMD's 6.77%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-1.41%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 6.98%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.17%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.