PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.08%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.39%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
4.16%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2800.34%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2800.34%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
1.08%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-15.38%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-15.38%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.25%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 3.31%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-0.83%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 1.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
4.28%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while AMD cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
8.56%
OCF growth under 50% of AMD's 23.56%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
11.00%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
87.72%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 109.50%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
34.54%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 41.94%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
46.44%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 34.82%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.37%
Below 50% of AMD's 136.47%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
13.89%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 23.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
473.10%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 310.92% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
370.76%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 154.31%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
303.98%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
73.62%
Equity/share CAGR of 73.62% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
9.94%
Below 50% of AMD's 86.48%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
43.36%
Below 50% of AMD's 100.52%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-25.54%
Cut dividends over 10 years while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-13.13%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-11.62%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-1.10%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 1.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
1.38%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 7.13%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
2.13%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 5.33%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
5.88%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.95%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-4.09%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.96%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.