205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.88%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 13.74%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
27.53%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 17.04%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-95.92%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 18.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-95.92%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 18.56%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
22.34%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 137.50%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
36.36%
EPS growth of 36.36% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
36.36%
Diluted EPS growth of 36.36% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
0.19%
Share change of 0.19% while AMD is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.28%
Diluted share change of 0.28% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-0.19%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-45.94%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 2.50%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-90.99%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 77.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
103.46%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 128.74%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
63.64%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to AMD's 69.58%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
9.95%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 37.79%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
169.26%
Below 50% of AMD's 616.60%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
1795.38%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 25.11%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
1540.34%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 584.74% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
1453.85%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 448.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
274.20%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 3.22%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.10%
Below 50% of AMD's 94.40%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
11.87%
Below 50% of AMD's 90.34%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.83%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-42.43%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
15.40%
AR growth well above AMD's 0.59%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
7.03%
We show growth while AMD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
6.18%
Asset growth at 50-75% of AMD's 10.48%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
7.50%
1.25-1.5x AMD's 6.17%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
3.05%
Debt shrinking faster vs. AMD's 107.98%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.80%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 11.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.