PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-25.76%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-23.84%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-64.30%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-51.83%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-43.99%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-38.89%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-38.89%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.06%
Share change of 0.06% while AMD is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
-0.20%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-3.09%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-113.53%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-8871.43%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
86.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 46.52%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
35.01%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 14.68%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
36.76%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-222.14%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-166.68%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
1100.28%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 192.57% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
350.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 248.57%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
93.82%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.91%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 91.68%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
101.64%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 25.82%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.40%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while AMD is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
40.10%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while AMD cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-1.06%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
1.41%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 8.73%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-1.01%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
3.26%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AMD's 1.04%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
37.42%
We have some new debt while AMD reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.28%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 8.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.