PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.08%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AMD's 7.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
21.62%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 9.55%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
67.84%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 165.76%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
67.84%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 165.76%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
93.02%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
88.89%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
77.78%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.42%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.80%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.65%
Diluted share count expanding well above AMD's 0.41%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
2.70%
Dividend growth of 2.70% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
107.56%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
304.55%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
50.60%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
12.73%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 1.21%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-2.10%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
273.52%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
99.32%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
308.53%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
184.44%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
29.95%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.76%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 35.85%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
60.15%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
91.48%
Dividend/share CAGR of 91.48% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
8.57%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while AMD is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
86.41%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while AMD cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
4.12%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AMD's 11.15%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
11.16%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 8.98%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.34%
Similar asset growth to AMD's 1.33%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
4.97%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AMD's 1.48%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-14.52%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
17.15%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 4.87%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
3.67%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AMD's 8.95%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.