PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.31%
Negative revenue growth while AMD stands at 0.35%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
2.08%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
24.74%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
24.74%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
587.55%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
558.82%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
568.75%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.89%
Slight or no buybacks while AMD is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.76%
Slight or no buyback while AMD is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-3.88%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-9.44%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-26.97%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
41.78%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 24.73%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
2.59%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 5.54%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-7.06%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.89%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
31.84%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2355.49%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 67.89% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
2232.04%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
780.74%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
146.09%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 33.46%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
111.23%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
84.04%
Dividend/share CAGR of 84.04% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
8.03%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while AMD is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
39.18%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while AMD cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-0.17%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.85%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 0.50%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
28.62%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
40.37%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AMD's 2.02%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-5.41%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-1.79%
Our R&D shrinks while AMD invests at 14.45%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-11.65%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.