PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.68%
Negative revenue growth while AMD stands at 15.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
9.32%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of AMD's 16.69%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
43.39%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 217.83%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
33.50%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 214.19%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
15.24%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 2132.10%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
20.00%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
20.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
45.37%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.78%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
42.90%
Diluted share count expanding well above AMD's 2.05%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-33.23%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-24.69%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 358.59%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-19.83%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 81.26%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-33.03%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD stands at 76.38%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-57.43%
Negative 5Y CAGR while AMD stands at 27.43%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-63.08%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD stands at 27.75%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.86%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-46.80%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
12.76%
Below 50% of AMD's 136.31%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-27.94%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-56.65%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
115.41%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 72.50%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
42.97%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
6.40%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
29.25%
Dividend/share CAGR of 29.25% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-1.57%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-33.25%
Negative near-term dividend growth while AMD invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-2.35%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 11.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
8.42%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 1.65%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
6.96%
Asset growth above 1.5x AMD's 3.32%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-25.51%
We have a declining book value while AMD shows 3.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-1.07%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 0.35%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-3.44%
Our R&D shrinks while AMD invests at 8.91%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
5.47%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 9.78%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.