PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.31%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
3.64%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
12.92%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
10.33%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
34.92%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
33.33%
EPS growth of 33.33% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
33.33%
Diluted EPS growth of 33.33% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
-29.56%
Share reduction while AMD is at 1.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-27.87%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
41.96%
Dividend growth of 41.96% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-48.82%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-112.03%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
3.06%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 28.35%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-24.01%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-27.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD stands at 10.08%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-52.04%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
385.77%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 184.53%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
143.28%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
73.69%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
48.33%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
145.52%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
49.68%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
83.48%
Dividend/share CAGR of 83.48% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
77.18%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while AMD is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
-2.22%
Negative near-term dividend growth while AMD invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
7.14%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
3.72%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 4.34%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-1.20%
Negative asset growth while AMD invests at 1.24%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
45.27%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-3.48%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 12.90%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
10.68%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 2.23%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-1.52%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 5.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.