PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.42%
Negative revenue growth while AMD stands at 11.27%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-0.96%
Negative gross profit growth while AMD is at 37.51%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-0.65%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 36.19%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-2.38%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 42.63%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
21.82%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
14.29%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
15.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
4.86%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 100.90%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
5.55%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 97.42%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-7.44%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
71.52%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
221.43%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
2.56%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 29.24%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-18.47%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-10.52%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD stands at 33.62%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.47%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
212.82%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
309.18%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
90.17%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
346.95%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
112.72%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 51.49%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
143.50%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
73.87%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
74.53%
Dividend/share CAGR of 74.53% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
31.98%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while AMD is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
-9.70%
Negative near-term dividend growth while AMD invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
16.07%
AR growth well above AMD's 19.24%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
9.29%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 15.29%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
19.47%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
12.42%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
16.35%
We have some new debt while AMD reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-4.11%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
10.71%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 3.95%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.