PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.15%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AMD's 3.09%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
8.67%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 1.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-18.95%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 5.05%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-14.93%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 5.05%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-47.61%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 97.24%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-48.68%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 95.52%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-47.22%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 114.75%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.47%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.91%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-4.07%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
2.45%
Dividend growth of 2.45% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-23.75%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 2.14%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-222.99%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
42.96%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 138.77%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-19.24%
Negative 5Y CAGR while AMD stands at 40.62%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
13.52%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 83.76%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
2418.16%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 487.19%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-16.24%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is at 81.41%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-19.88%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD stands at 1007.46%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
7472.52%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 1254.66% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
105.66%
Below 50% of AMD's 400.54%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-64.38%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD is 1272.10%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
287.85%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 114.37%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
182.94%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
76.79%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 29.00%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
15.66%
Stable or rising dividend while AMD is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
-4.26%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-1.77%
Negative near-term dividend growth while AMD invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
12.58%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AMD's 29.02%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
10.11%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 13.63%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-6.23%
Negative asset growth while AMD invests at 8.23%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.27%
We have a declining book value while AMD shows 17.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
4.89%
We have some new debt while AMD reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
33.25%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 4.57%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
13.25%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.