PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.30%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-4.22%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
15.97%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
15.09%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-6.77%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-2.56%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-2.63%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.73%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.77%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
17.08%
Slight or no buyback while AMD is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
4.95%
Dividend growth of 4.95% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
34.22%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-197.20%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 16429.41%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
29.76%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 117.35%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-26.65%
Negative 5Y CAGR while AMD stands at 74.49%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
12.01%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 70.66%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-2.10%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD stands at 142.03%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
7.60%
Below 50% of AMD's 67.70%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
24.27%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 13.08%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
953.20%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 303.54% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
90.10%
Below 50% of AMD's 181.94%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
299.75%
Below 50% of AMD's 1384.83%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
302.95%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 145.13%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
168.64%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 32.98%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
91.42%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 39.15%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
21.42%
Stable or rising dividend while AMD is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
-2.02%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-2.13%
Negative near-term dividend growth while AMD invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-6.69%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
9.89%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 18.29%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-3.38%
Negative asset growth while AMD invests at 7.37%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.45%
Under 50% of AMD's 8.49%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-3.74%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-17.26%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-11.48%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 13.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.