PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.42%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-49.76%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-230.13%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-230.13%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-185.65%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-184.62%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-184.62%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
1.23%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 5.02%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
1.23%
Slight or no buyback while AMD is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-1.21%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
392.44%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
131.24%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-15.41%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD stands at 64.24%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-28.11%
Negative 5Y CAGR while AMD stands at 77.42%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-17.91%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD stands at 59.20%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
1951.34%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
200.68%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
65.62%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
12.15%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-319.46%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is 141.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-430.85%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD is 122.85%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
352.70%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 185.97%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
150.63%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 50.35%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
85.64%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 68.54%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
-79.28%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
-2.78%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-2.08%
Negative near-term dividend growth while AMD invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-14.48%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 20.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-8.31%
Inventory is declining while AMD stands at 13.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-3.13%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-3.76%
We have a declining book value while AMD shows 10.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-2.28%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-7.62%
Our R&D shrinks while AMD invests at 8.46%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
14.94%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 4.80%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.