PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.23%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-17.32%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
17.79%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
17.79%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
40.61%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
36.36%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
36.36%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-6.67%
Share reduction while AMD is at 4.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-6.67%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 1.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
7.15%
Dividend growth of 7.15% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-43.00%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 144.66%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-90.98%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 76.02%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-22.52%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD stands at 39.01%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-30.24%
Negative 5Y CAGR while AMD stands at 32.23%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-18.27%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
23879.66%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 4.76%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
98.23%
Below 50% of AMD's 321.15%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-44.59%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD stands at 240.39%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
26.28%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
27.72%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-166.64%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
283.66%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 182.39%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
154.84%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 40.62%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
78.94%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 55.94%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
-68.64%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
1.81%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1.81% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
1.65%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 1.65% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-13.03%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-16.82%
Inventory is declining while AMD stands at 12.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-8.73%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.32%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
1.53%
Debt growth far above AMD's 1.41%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-13.11%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-22.00%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.