PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.35%
Negative revenue growth while AMD stands at 24.29%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-2.35%
Negative gross profit growth while AMD is at 78.80%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-9.39%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 87.64%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-9.39%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 92.45%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
0.85%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 91.53%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-3.57%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-3.57%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-4.27%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-4.27%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
1.64%
Dividend growth of 1.64% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
133.53%
OCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 52.44%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
2372.73%
FCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 72.04%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-12.84%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD stands at 39.81%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
44.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 65.32%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
27.18%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 2.25%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
90.99%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
16.19%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
160.94%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-16.62%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-293.74%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is 35.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-187.06%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
419.26%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 144.02%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
175.56%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 51.73%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
158.15%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 50.24%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
28.19%
Stable or rising dividend while AMD is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
6.92%
Dividend/share CAGR of 6.92% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
54.74%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 54.74% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-17.32%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 12.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-16.56%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.51%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
7.46%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-1.19%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 1.63%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
6.70%
We increase R&D while AMD cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-3.53%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 8.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.