PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.24%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
47.23%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 2.60%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
83.58%
EBIT growth above 1.5x AMD's 21.92%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
83.58%
Operating income growth above 1.5x AMD's 21.92%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
67.24%
Net income growth above 1.5x AMD's 42.16%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
72.41%
EPS growth of 72.41% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
72.41%
Diluted EPS growth of 72.41% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
18.75%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.20%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
18.75%
Diluted share change of 18.75% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-13.45%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-62.05%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 88.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-67.65%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 145.07%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-45.13%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD stands at 18.82%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-35.18%
Negative 5Y CAGR while AMD stands at 40.74%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-24.61%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD stands at 22.30%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
1782.46%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-18.33%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is at 57.94%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
14.77%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 724.25%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-148.33%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-123.65%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-112.54%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD is 93.89%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
216.59%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 114.92%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
124.69%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 47.89%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
49.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 60.39%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
-27.60%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
-7.16%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-5.66%
Negative near-term dividend growth while AMD invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
4.26%
AR growth well above AMD's 4.91%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
2.26%
We show growth while AMD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-1.53%
Negative asset growth while AMD invests at 5.63%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-16.01%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
0.24%
Debt shrinking faster vs. AMD's 38.13%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
1.57%
R&D dropping or stable vs. AMD's 6.84%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-11.96%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.