PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.34%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
40.10%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
452.27%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
452.27%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
350.00%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
350.00%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
350.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.11%
Dividend growth of 18.11% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
30.74%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
19.32%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-23.21%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-31.88%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-23.85%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
92.96%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-48.34%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
5.65%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-12.50%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-69.24%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-75.71%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
285.89%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 97.56%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
105.52%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 45.43%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
42.79%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
15.92%
Stable or rising dividend while AMD is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
6.77%
Dividend/share CAGR of 6.77% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
8.43%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 8.43% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
22.90%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
6.77%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 0.87%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-3.53%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-3.98%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.12%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 3.81%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
11.32%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 2.16%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.