PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.54%
Negative revenue growth while AMD stands at 35.06%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.90%
Negative gross profit growth while AMD is at 230.89%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-38.53%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 20.22%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-38.53%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-413.30%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-427.27%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-427.27%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-4.63%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-4.63%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
3.93%
Dividend growth of 3.93% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
31.68%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
71.62%
FCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 18.44%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-5.13%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-15.47%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-15.91%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
85.67%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
50.12%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-19.16%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-771.93%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-97.66%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-236.55%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
384.28%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 26.64%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
73.59%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
22.61%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 9.79%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
31.76%
Stable or rising dividend while AMD is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
1.27%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1.27% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
11.94%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 11.94% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-19.03%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-4.01%
Inventory is declining while AMD stands at 2.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.48%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
1.47%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.72%
Our R&D shrinks while AMD invests at 10.81%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-6.80%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 22.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.