PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.71%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
1.74%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 1.02%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-18.30%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-18.30%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 1.57%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
3.42%
Net income growth at 75-90% of AMD's 4.28%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.42%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.38%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.42%
Diluted share count expanding well above AMD's 0.38%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-3.31%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
92.86%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 81.76%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
237.50%
FCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 54.69%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-16.43%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-2.34%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-18.48%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
23.60%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
10.68%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-41.48%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-18.75%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
110.54%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-90.75%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
285.08%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 0.94%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
66.14%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-14.43%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
15.94%
Stable or rising dividend while AMD is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
1.45%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1.45% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
7.83%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 7.83% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
5.49%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
13.38%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 6.21%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.66%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-1.39%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-12.30%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
3.92%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 2.68%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
8.97%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.