PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.29%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 47.81%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
17.45%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AMD's 48.46%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
99.20%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 69.04%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
99.20%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 75.52%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
269.42%
Net income growth above 1.5x AMD's 77.71%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
271.43%
EPS growth above 1.5x AMD's 77.50%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
257.14%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x AMD's 77.50%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.54%
Share reduction while AMD is at 0.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
3.44%
Diluted share count expanding well above AMD's 0.29%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
0.54%
Dividend growth of 0.54% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
34.92%
OCF growth under 50% of AMD's 100.01%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
28.24%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-3.87%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD stands at 24.27%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
8.86%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 14.48%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
-19.76%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
64.67%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-17.74%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
4.61%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
151.10%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
147.51%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-34.10%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
308.57%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
72.15%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-8.05%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
31.93%
Stable or rising dividend while AMD is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
-1.18%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
5.82%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 5.82% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
5.69%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AMD's 54.46%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-0.50%
Inventory is declining while AMD stands at 48.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.09%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 25.89%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
5.01%
Under 50% of AMD's 30.74%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-4.68%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 25.04%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
10.38%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 2.63%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-4.57%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 11.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.