PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.39%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AMD's 2.05%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
12.03%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 2.39%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
24.89%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 22.30%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
24.89%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 18.20%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
20.16%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
19.05%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
19.05%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
1.79%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.66%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-1.12%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-1.76%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
28.75%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 23.47%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
1975.00%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
7.68%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 30.32%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
22.96%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
61.53%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 19.55%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
45.01%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
48.79%
Below 50% of AMD's 367.11%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-12.33%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD stands at 245.07%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
99.88%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
21.43%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
327.27%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 73.11%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
287.62%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
68.15%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-0.31%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
81.51%
Stable or rising dividend while AMD is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
-1.12%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
1.53%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 1.53% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
15.02%
AR growth well above AMD's 11.23%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
11.93%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 4.85%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.68%
Asset growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.09%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.11%
50-75% of AMD's 1.57%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-4.70%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
4.05%
We increase R&D while AMD cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
5.93%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.