PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.28%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
0.54%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AMD's 4.73%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
10.98%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
10.98%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
27.66%
Net income growth at 75-90% of AMD's 36.26%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
32.00%
EPS growth similar to AMD's 33.33%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
28.00%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of AMD's 33.33%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
-1.93%
Share reduction while AMD is at 0.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.28%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.79%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
86.17%
OCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 3.42%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
308.00%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
7.93%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 25.62%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
32.39%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 55.55%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
69.82%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 57.19%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
102.84%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 3.40%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
72.68%
Below 50% of AMD's 455.14%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
172.49%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 249.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
158.75%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
36.06%
Below 50% of AMD's 134.54%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
564.91%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 122.78%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
285.05%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
58.13%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 11.37%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
7.89%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
39.88%
Stable or rising dividend while AMD is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
5.99%
Dividend/share CAGR of 5.99% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-6.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while AMD invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
1.81%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AMD's 6.21%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
5.53%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 11.16%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
0.54%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 3.89%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
5.72%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AMD's 3.63%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-51.52%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 2.42%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-6.03%
Our R&D shrinks while AMD invests at 2.70%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-6.93%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 12.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.