PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.98%
Negative revenue growth while AMD stands at 1.96%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-10.41%
Negative gross profit growth while AMD is at 3.91%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-26.33%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-26.33%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-12.97%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-12.12%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-12.50%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.35%
Share reduction while AMD is at 5.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.65%
Dividend growth of 22.65% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
38.54%
Similar OCF growth to AMD's 37.51%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
78.76%
FCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 24.53%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-2.53%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD stands at 24.77%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
16.81%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 4.89%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
63.75%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 20.31%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
160.39%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 12.53%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
34.06%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
55.27%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 194.20%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
124.14%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
7.41%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
492.03%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
269.66%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
41.08%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 22.28%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
2.06%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
64.52%
Stable or rising dividend while AMD is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
29.35%
Dividend/share CAGR of 29.35% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
13.43%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 13.43% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-13.69%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-7.37%
Inventory is declining while AMD stands at 8.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.00%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 7.71%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.65%
Under 50% of AMD's 8.13%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-1.04%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
1.04%
R&D dropping or stable vs. AMD's 9.47%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
3.72%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AMD's 21.49%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.