PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.73%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 9.15%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
1.31%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-2.41%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 18.50%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-2.41%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 16.71%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-70.59%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 53.07%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-69.48%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 55.56%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-69.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 50.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-3.03%
Share reduction while AMD is at 0.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-3.09%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.93%
Dividend growth of 0.93% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-34.43%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 5.18%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-46.04%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 17.68%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
57.48%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to AMD's 62.74%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
125.75%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 23.07%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
69.50%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
176.00%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 593.82%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
39.23%
Below 50% of AMD's 123.29%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-6.21%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD stands at 16450738.85%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
581.29%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 298.53% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
765.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 151.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
79.28%
Below 50% of AMD's 411.22%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
194.56%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 37.83%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
15.59%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
20.14%
Below 50% of AMD's 56.93%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
40.48%
Dividend/share CAGR of 40.48% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
37.98%
Dividend/share CAGR of 37.98% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
41.93%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 41.93% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
8.29%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AMD's 19.75%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
11.69%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 14.91%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-7.18%
Negative asset growth while AMD invests at 3.94%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-3.02%
We have a declining book value while AMD shows 2.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.34%
We increase R&D while AMD cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
3.35%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.