Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)

Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

Share reduction while AMD is at 0.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.

Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.

10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 18.55%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.

5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 19.28%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.

Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.

Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.

Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.

Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.

Dividend/share CAGR of 373.94% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.

Dividend/share CAGR of 367.18% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.

3Y dividend/share CAGR of 298.29% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.

Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.

Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.