Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)

Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 2.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

Dividend growth of 9.57% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.

Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.

Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.

Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.

Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.

Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.

Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.

Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.

Dividend/share CAGR of 656.97% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.

Dividend/share CAGR of 692.36% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.

3Y dividend/share CAGR of 267.82% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.

Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.

Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Our R&D shrinks while AMD invests at 25.36%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.

We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 2.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.