PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.34%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 17.91%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
7.29%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AMD's 25.64%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
14.75%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 5138.46%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
14.68%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 1772.73%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
21.75%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 1232.08%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
23.26%
EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
23.81%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.04%
Share reduction while AMD is at 1.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.63%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 8.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
9.10%
Dividend growth of 9.10% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
20.02%
OCF growth under 50% of AMD's 909.86%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-7.07%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 508.79%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
54.53%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
32.29%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
2.56%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
42.74%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with AMD's 44.66%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
6.47%
Below 50% of AMD's 68.55%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
40.02%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 219.79%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
99.29%
Below 50% of AMD's 687.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
85.55%
Below 50% of AMD's 2226.01%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
15.90%
Below 50% of AMD's 257.95%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
45.75%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
3.31%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
1.15%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
508.03%
Dividend/share CAGR of 508.03% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
370.06%
Dividend/share CAGR of 370.06% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
203.64%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 203.64% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-11.01%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 30.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
7.71%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 10.10%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.81%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 3.78%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
4.09%
Under 50% of AMD's 233.13%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.80%
Our R&D shrinks while AMD invests at 2.86%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
2.35%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.