Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)

Revenue growth above 1.5x AMD's 5.02%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.

Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.

Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Share reduction while AMD is at 0.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.

Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.

Dividend growth of 0.70% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.

Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.

Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.

Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.

Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.

Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.

Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.

Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.

Dividend/share CAGR of 513.01% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.

Dividend/share CAGR of 384.68% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.

3Y dividend/share CAGR of 52.06% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.

Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.

Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

R&D dropping or stable vs. AMD's 14.86%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.