Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)

Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.14%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.

Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Operating income growth above 1.5x AMD's 2.40%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.

Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Share reduction while AMD is at 0.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.

Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.

Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.

Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.

Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.

Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.

Dividend/share CAGR of 493.84% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.

Dividend/share CAGR of 784467.57% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.

3Y dividend/share CAGR of 50.12% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.

AR growth is negative/stable vs. AMD's 5.52%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.

Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

We increase R&D while AMD cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.