PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.75%
Negative revenue growth while AMD stands at 1.92%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-8.29%
Negative gross profit growth while AMD is at 0.54%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-0.24%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 243.20%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
0.24%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 222.66%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
9.66%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 417.80%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
11.27%
EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
8.45%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.01%
Share reduction while AMD is at 0.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.59%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 7.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
8.09%
Dividend growth of 8.09% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-6.68%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
0.76%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
72.41%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
34.31%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
16.04%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
177.75%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
85.39%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
1.19%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
120.11%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
96.83%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 152.87%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
46.06%
Below 50% of AMD's 117.02%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
22.64%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
19.66%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
22.49%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
511.63%
Dividend/share CAGR of 511.63% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
336.24%
Dividend/share CAGR of 336.24% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
29.79%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 29.79% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-13.45%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 26.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
6.74%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 1.61%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
5.95%
Asset growth at 50-75% of AMD's 8.03%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
5.84%
Under 50% of AMD's 63.38%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.00%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-0.26%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 5.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.