PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.77%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-7.59%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-25.49%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-26.18%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-29.30%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 36.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-29.11%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-28.57%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.43%
Share reduction while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.42%
Diluted share change of 0.42% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
0.43%
Dividend growth of 0.43% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-58.05%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 21.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-65.34%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 17.93%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
103.42%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
38.18%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
17.88%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
557.38%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
25.82%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-8.46%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
339.00%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 78.36% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
54.62%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 77.69%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
14.40%
Below 50% of AMD's 217.93%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
23.29%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
27.79%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
21.98%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
526.91%
Dividend/share CAGR of 526.91% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
332.92%
Dividend/share CAGR of 332.92% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
30.81%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 30.81% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
3.29%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
10.39%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 2.53%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-0.68%
Negative asset growth while AMD invests at 4.94%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.75%
Under 50% of AMD's 53.80%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.65%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 4.26%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
1.54%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AMD's 4.40%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.