PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.95%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
1.45%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AMD's 4.20%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-0.33%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 63.24%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.33%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 94.44%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
0.90%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1.79%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1.82%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.94%
Share reduction while AMD is at 0.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.17%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-1.03%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
22.29%
OCF growth under 50% of AMD's 203.57%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
10.25%
FCF growth under 50% of AMD's 151.94%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
163.00%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
25.66%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
17.83%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
66.82%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 148.42%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
32.66%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
38.83%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 160.28%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
628.47%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 60.29% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-62.18%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
30.50%
Below 50% of AMD's 104.28%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
33.35%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
14.54%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
24.70%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
528.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 528.07% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
328.75%
Dividend/share CAGR of 328.75% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
29.76%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 29.76% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.63%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
5.01%
We show growth while AMD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
28.46%
Asset growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.29%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.09%
75-90% of AMD's 4.75%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.47%
R&D growth of 0.47% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
3.79%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.