PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.23%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 7.37%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-0.51%
Negative gross profit growth while AMD is at 5.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-13.11%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 20.72%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-10.06%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 31.43%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-10.57%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 59.02%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-8.77%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 62.50%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-8.93%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 62.50%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.04%
Share reduction while AMD is at 0.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.95%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.30%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
80.35%
OCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 8.62%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
166.20%
FCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 22.43%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
173.88%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 4.44%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
21.32%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
16.64%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
397.80%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 22.23%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
257.54%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
23.30%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 172.98%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
850.50%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 124.56% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
12.70%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
21.68%
Below 50% of AMD's 160.37%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
39.50%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
20.69%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
24.51%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 8.63%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
484.42%
Dividend/share CAGR of 484.42% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
323.55%
Dividend/share CAGR of 323.55% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
28.78%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 28.78% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.70%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AMD's 19.63%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
11.52%
We show growth while AMD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
22.28%
Asset growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.23%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
2.19%
Under 50% of AMD's 5.55%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
65.84%
We have some new debt while AMD reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-6.84%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-5.60%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 4.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.