PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.33%
Negative revenue growth while AMD stands at 0.06%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-11.24%
Negative gross profit growth while AMD is at 2.25%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-53.58%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-55.16%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-50.42%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-50.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-49.02%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.70%
Share reduction while AMD is at 0.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.35%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
31.32%
Dividend growth of 31.32% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-14.67%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-13.44%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
169.55%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
27.62%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
54.82%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 14.13%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
75.33%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
48.49%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-2.06%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD stands at 161.94%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
461.83%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-42.35%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is 77.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
214.05%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 89.71%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
29.85%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
24.58%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
32.42%
Below 50% of AMD's 1705.71%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
655.09%
Dividend/share CAGR of 655.09% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
330.01%
Dividend/share CAGR of 330.01% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
54.35%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 54.35% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-13.40%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 1.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-9.01%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.96%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.03%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-3.60%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
20.00%
We increase R&D while AMD cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
14.43%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.