PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.86%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
7.84%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AMD's 2262.96%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
55.61%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 112.78%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
50.63%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 113.28%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
68.30%
Net income growth at 50-75% of AMD's 106.27%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
65.22%
EPS growth at 50-75% of AMD's 106.25%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
72.73%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of AMD's 106.25%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
-0.26%
Share reduction while AMD is at 0.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.94%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 2.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.26%
Dividend growth of 0.26% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
50.33%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
52.89%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
157.09%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 8.86%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
22.78%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
50.86%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 7.71%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
190.70%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 134.76%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
-5.25%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is at 109.53%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
34.69%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 150.77%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
682.46%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 109.25% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-7.84%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is 104.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
90.65%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of AMD's 110.77%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
63.47%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
22.37%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
34.60%
Below 50% of AMD's 316.81%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
643.71%
Dividend/share CAGR of 643.71% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
113.74%
Dividend/share CAGR of 113.74% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
55.92%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 55.92% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
10.22%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
1.73%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 42.39%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-2.44%
Negative asset growth while AMD invests at 1.06%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.05%
Under 50% of AMD's 5.46%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-11.01%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 0.10%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-5.70%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-1.30%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.