Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)

Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.

Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Share reduction while AMD is at 0.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.

Dividend growth of 0.37% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.

Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.

Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.

10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 14.88%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 71.58% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.

Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.

Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.

Dividend/share CAGR of 707.91% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.

Dividend/share CAGR of 113.40% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.

3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.13% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.

Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.

Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.

Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.