PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.16%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-4.91%
Negative gross profit growth while AMD is at 150.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
133.15%
EBIT growth above 1.5x AMD's 76.42%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
184.17%
Operating income growth above 1.5x AMD's 84.40%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
37.12%
Net income growth at 50-75% of AMD's 69.13%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
39.13%
EPS growth at 50-75% of AMD's 69.84%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
39.13%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of AMD's 69.84%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
-0.54%
Share reduction while AMD is at 0.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.09%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.74%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-66.82%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 45.80%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-72.09%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 43.18%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
98.72%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
5.70%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
0.26%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
177.32%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 9.24%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-32.68%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-43.52%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
367.16%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 54.05% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-34.45%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is 67.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-38.72%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
54.13%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
33.19%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
24.41%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
846.73%
Dividend/share CAGR of 846.73% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
109.10%
Dividend/share CAGR of 109.10% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
73.43%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 73.43% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
8.37%
AR growth well above AMD's 2.38%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-3.24%
Inventory is declining while AMD stands at 9.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.81%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.46%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.05%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 0.10%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-1.41%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
6.74%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.