PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.62%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of AMD's 6.71%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
14.26%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 3.15%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
51.57%
EBIT growth 50-75% of AMD's 71.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
129.37%
Operating income growth above 1.5x AMD's 52.94%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
82.32%
Net income growth above 1.5x AMD's 49.32%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
84.37%
EPS growth above 1.5x AMD's 47.37%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
81.25%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x AMD's 47.37%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.36%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.53%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
33.67%
Dividend growth of 33.67% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
87.22%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 77.42%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
109.06%
FCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 64.00%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
104.15%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
8.82%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-4.55%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
179.43%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
55.41%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 88.14%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
31.35%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 65.78%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
754.81%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 75.28% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
34.33%
Below 50% of AMD's 94.92%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-6.00%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
58.52%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
32.67%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
24.26%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
1208.79%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1208.79% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
180.15%
Dividend/share CAGR of 180.15% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
130.21%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 130.21% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
11.85%
AR growth well above AMD's 3.88%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
1.18%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 15.99%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-1.54%
Negative asset growth while AMD invests at 2.63%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.43%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-9.11%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-7.16%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
2.61%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.