PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.36%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AMD's 3.15%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
17.05%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 2.26%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
41.52%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
42.32%
Operating income growth of 42.32% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
40.25%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
43.18%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
40.91%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.93%
Share reduction while AMD is at 8.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.91%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.31%
Dividend growth of 0.31% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
67.75%
OCF growth at 75-90% of AMD's 86.27%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
80.52%
FCF growth similar to AMD's 77.33%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
67.30%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
58.50%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 12.75%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
2.76%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
152.27%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
64.60%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 81.99%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
32.57%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
155.09%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
210.77%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 89.24%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
9.70%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
38.59%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
34.39%
Below 50% of AMD's 199.81%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
3.61%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
1337.84%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1337.84% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
174.90%
Dividend/share CAGR of 174.90% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
132.42%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 132.42% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
12.69%
AR growth well above AMD's 3.81%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
1.75%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 10.47%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-5.94%
Negative asset growth while AMD invests at 3.36%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-0.53%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-17.76%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 3.37%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-4.64%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-1.46%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 1.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.