Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)

Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.

Dividend growth of 13.02% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.

Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.

Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.

Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.

Dividend/share CAGR of 1232.73% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.

Dividend/share CAGR of 183.53% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.

3Y dividend/share CAGR of 100.21% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.

We show growth while AMD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.

Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.

Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 0.18%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.

Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.