Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)

Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Share reduction while AMD is at 1.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.

Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

Dividend growth of 0.21% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.

Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.

Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.

Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 71.18%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.

Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.

Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.

Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.

Dividend/share CAGR of 1248.38% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.

Dividend/share CAGR of 182.07% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.

3Y dividend/share CAGR of 99.80% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.

Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.

Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.

Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 2.53%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.

We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.