Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)

Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.

Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

EPS growth of 6.45% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.

Diluted EPS growth of 6.56% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.

Share reduction while AMD is at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.

Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

Dividend growth of 0.43% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.

Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 46.07%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.

Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.

Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.

Dividend/share CAGR of 1263.46% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.

Dividend/share CAGR of 181.31% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.

3Y dividend/share CAGR of 100.13% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.

Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.

Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 16.13%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.

Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.