PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.10%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 12.63%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
6.17%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 3.02%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
15.50%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
15.25%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of AMD's 19.71%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
14.66%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
16.67%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
16.92%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.40%
Share reduction while AMD is at 0.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.52%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.30%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
71.83%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
82.73%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
52.13%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
6.46%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
12.10%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
48.23%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
24.14%
Below 50% of AMD's 56.78%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
29.91%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 76.67%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
101.43%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
7.87%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
12.80%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
33.75%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
16.21%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-3.10%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
2216987.49%
Dividend/share CAGR of 2216987.49% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
182.59%
Dividend/share CAGR of 182.59% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
98.80%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 98.80% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
3.28%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-6.05%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-5.66%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-0.92%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-15.40%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-1.25%
Our R&D shrinks while AMD invests at 2.55%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-7.66%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.