PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.00%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-6.56%
Negative gross profit growth while AMD is at 18.41%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-0.77%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 67.72%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1.89%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 50.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
4.76%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 48.22%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
3.90%
EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 48.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
5.26%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 48.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.82%
Share reduction while AMD is at 0.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.77%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
11.84%
Dividend growth of 11.84% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
1.49%
OCF growth under 50% of AMD's 189.83%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-0.31%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 125.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
40.82%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
4.85%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
17.82%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
149.80%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
34.74%
Below 50% of AMD's 122.65%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
45.06%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 117.38%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
102.44%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
2.85%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
248.52%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 79.77%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
32.16%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
10.44%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-0.13%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
1175.51%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1175.51% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
192.39%
Dividend/share CAGR of 192.39% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
80.78%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 80.78% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-21.34%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-4.52%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.87%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.58%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.29%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-3.16%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-6.68%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 0.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.