PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.81%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 23.44%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
9.81%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of AMD's 18.59%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
15.53%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 308.82%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
15.39%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 78.87%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
15.19%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 163.30%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
15.71%
EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 164.29%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
14.49%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 157.14%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.32%
Share reduction while AMD is at 10.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.20%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 3.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.06%
Dividend growth of 0.06% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
95.43%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
115.37%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
37.03%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
9.05%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
18.09%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
158.94%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
95.19%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
74.36%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-46.89%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
40.42%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
36.42%
Below 50% of AMD's 180.00%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
20.58%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
5.27%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-1.05%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
1158.01%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1158.01% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
193.41%
Dividend/share CAGR of 193.41% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
35.90%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 35.90% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.23%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AMD's 32.09%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
3.93%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 10.07%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
0.04%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 11.24%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.17%
Under 50% of AMD's 25.88%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-12.29%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
5.90%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 0.41%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
2.95%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AMD's 11.43%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.