Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)

Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 2.12%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.

Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Share reduction while AMD is at 14.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.

Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

Dividend growth of 0.00% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.

Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 95.91% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.

Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 11.11%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.

Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.

Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.

Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.

Dividend/share CAGR of 526.04% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.

Dividend/share CAGR of 192.90% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.

3Y dividend/share CAGR of 66.12% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.

AR growth is negative/stable vs. AMD's 24.29%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.

We show growth while AMD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.

Asset growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 2.15%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.

Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

R&D dropping or stable vs. AMD's 5.17%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.

We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 3.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.